| Home > In process > Assessing (H)EFT theory errors by pitting EoM against field redefinitions |
| Journal Article | PUBDB-2026-01214 |
; ; ;
2026
Springer
Heidelberg
This record in other databases:
Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)199
Report No.: DESY-25-171; IPPP/25/76; arXiv:2511.15609
Abstract: Truncations of effective field theory expansions are technically necessary but inherently intertwined with the redundancies of general field redefinitions. This can be viewed as a juxtaposition of power-counting and theoretical uncertainties, which seek to estimate neglected higher-dimensional interactions through approaches based on community consensus. One can then understand the invariance of physics under field redefinitions as a data-informed validation of different power-counting schemes, or as a means of assigning theoretical errors in comparison with algebraic, equation of motion-based replacements. Such an approach generalises widely accepted procedures for estimating theoretical uncertainties within the SM to non-renormalisable interactions. We perform a case study for a representative example in Higgs Effective Field theory, focusing on universal Higgs properties tensioned against process-dependent sensitivity expectations.
Keyword(s): Effective Field Theories ; Higgs Properties ; Specific BSM Phenomenology
;
|
The record appears in these collections: |