% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Talut:88666,
      author       = {Talut, G. and Grenzer, J. and Reuther, H. and Shalimov, A.
                      and Baehtz, C. and Novikov, D. and Walz, B. and DESY},
      title        = {{I}n situ observation of secondary phase formation in {F}e
                      implanted {G}a{N} annealed in low pressure ${N}_2$
                      atmosphere},
      journal      = {Applied physics letters},
      volume       = {95},
      issn         = {0003-6951},
      address      = {Melville, NY},
      publisher    = {American Institute of Physics},
      reportid     = {PHPPUBDB-12678},
      pages        = {232506},
      year         = {2009},
      note         = {© American Institute of Physics},
      abstract     = {The formation of secondary phases in Fe implanted GaN upon
                      annealing in low pressure N$_2$-atmosphere was detected by
                      means of in situ x-ray diffraction and confirmed by
                      magnetization measurements. A repeatable phase change from
                      Fe$_3$N at room temperature and Fe$_3$−$_x$N at 1023 K was
                      observed in situ. The phase transformation is explained by
                      the change of lattice site and concentration of nitrogen
                      within nitrides. The diffusion of Fe toward sample surface
                      and oxidation with increasing annealing cycles limits the
                      availability of secondary phase and hence the repeatability.
                      At high temperature GaN dissolves and Ga as well as Fe
                      oxidize due to presence of residual oxygen in the process
                      gas. The ferromagnetism in the samples is related to
                      nanometer sized interacting Fe$_3$−$_x$Ncrystallites.GaN
                      is a wide band gap semiconductor that has been studied
                      intensively in the last years because of its potential field
                      of applications like in optoelectronics, plasmonics, as well
                      as for high power electronics. By doping with transitional
                      metals like Fe it might also be a diluted magnetic
                      semiconductor (DMS) with a Curie temperature above room
                      temperature (RT) and could then be used for spintronics.1
                      There are many experimental studies reporting ferromagnetism
                      at RT in Fe doped GaN. In a real DMS, with magnetic atoms
                      randomly substituting cation sites, ferromagnetic coupling
                      is supposed to be due to the indirect exchange coupling
                      between magnetic impurities mediated by holes.1–4
                      Experimental observation of strong-coupling effects in a DMS
                      Ga$_1$−$_x$Fe$_x$Nwas reported by Pacuski et al.5 Robust
                      ferromagnetism in the region of insulator-to-metal
                      transition was predicted for high hole densities. However,
                      there are also other possible sources of ferromagnetism like
                      spinodal decomposition of Fe or ferromagnetic secondary
                      phases. The detection of those is rather difficult. Bonanni
                      et al.6 prepared GaN:Fe layers by metalorganic chemical
                      vapor deposition (MOCVD) and observed ferromagnetism that
                      was partially accounted to the spinodal decomposition and
                      non-uniform distribution of Fe-rich magnetic nanocrystals.
                      Kuwabara et al.7 reported the formation of nanoclusters and
                      superparamagnetic behavior in GaN:Fe epilayers prepared by
                      rf-plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. In case of ion
                      implantation the reports from different groups are quite
                      controversial. Theodoropoulou et al.8 and Shon et al.9,10
                      did not relate ferromagnetic response to secondary phases
                      after transition ion implantation into semiconductors. In
                      our experiments, however, the formation of α-Fe
                      nanoclusters, that were responsible for ferromagnetic
                      response, was observed.11 Though the appearance of such
                      precipitates is not desired in a DMS they might be useful
                      for certain applications.12 Li et al.13 detected
                      co-occurrence of α-Fe and ε-Fe$_3$Nin MOCVD prepared
                      GaN:Fe films and pointed out the role of nitrogen pressure
                      and structural disorder in the formation of Fe-rich phases.
                      Bonanni et al.14 have shown that the controlled aggregation
                      of magnetic ions in a semiconductor can be affected by the
                      growth rate and doping with shallow impurities.Recently we
                      reported predominant formation of epitaxially oriented
                      α-Fenanoclusters if Fe-doped samples were annealed in a
                      N$_2$ flow at 1.1 bar pressure.11 In this paper we report
                      the formation of ε-Fe$_3$−$_x$N with x<1 that builds up
                      during annealing at 1073 K in 0.5 bar N2 and the reversible
                      transformation to ε-Fe$_3$Nduring cooling down to RT.P-type
                      (Mg) doped (∼2×10$^{17}$cm$^{−3}$)single crystalline
                      wurtzite GaN(001) films of about 3μm thickness epitaxially
                      grown by metal organic vapor phase epitaxy on sapphire (001)
                      were used. Samples, 7° tilted relative to the ion beam to
                      avoid channeling, were implanted with 195 keV $^{57}$Fe ions
                      with fluence Φ=4×10$^{16}$cm$^{−2}$ (peak Fe
                      concentration of 4 at. \% at the projected range
                      R$_p$=85nm according to TRIM$^{15}$), keeping the samples at
                      RT. In order to reduce the implantation damage and to
                      investigate the formation of secondary phases the implanted
                      samples were annealed at 1073 K in a low pressure
                      N$_2$-atmosphere(0.5 bar) within several minutes. The
                      annealing experiments along with the in situ x-ray
                      diffraction characterization were performed at the
                      Rossendorf beamline at the ESRF in Grenoble with a x-ray
                      wavelength of λ=0.124nm. The annealing chamber was equipped
                      with a boron nitride heater, controlled by a Eurotherm
                      controller, gas inlet and a half sphere beryllium dome. The
                      temperature was measured by a PtRh/Pt thermocouple placed on
                      top of the heater. The gas pressure in the chamber was
                      limited to 0.5 bar with a flow of about 40l⋅min$^{−1}$.
                      The purity of the N$_2$gas (99.9999\%) was limited by the
                      setup with an oxygen contamination in the ppm range.A
                      Pilatus 100 K two-dimensional (2D) pixel detector was used
                      to record 2D diffraction pattern. Additionally, a
                      scintillation counter was used for 2θ-ω-scans. Generally,
                      for clusters in the range of some nm the signal to
                      background ratio is very low. In order to increase the
                      signal to background ratio to an acceptable level the
                      acquisition time of the 2D detector was set to 10 s and
                      those of the scintillation counter to 5 s per point. The
                      investigations of the magnetic properties were performed
                      with a Quantum Design MPMS superconducting quantum
                      interference device magnetometer. For the evaluation of the
                      2D detector exposures rectangular areas with dimensions 2θ
                      from 32.3° to 36.5° and χ=±0.2° (angle ⊥ to the
                      scattering plane) were integrated over χ and assumed as
                      line scans. Those line scans are represented over
                      annealing/cooling time with the color/grayscale coded
                      intensity in Fig. 1(a). Single examples of line scans are
                      given in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c) for RT and 1073 K,
                      respectively. Prior to the annealing procedure (time t=0 at
                      RT) no reflexes from secondary phases were detected [see
                      Fig. 1(a)]. After about 200 s annealing, at 1073 K, a broad
                      reflex starts to evolve in the region between 32.5° and
                      35° with a local maximum at about 33.3°. The peak shift
                      due to the lattice expansion from RT to 1073 K is in the
                      order of 0.1° and can be neglected. The position of the
                      maximum fits well to the pattern of FeN(200) (33.46° at
                      RT). However, because of the broadness of the reflex, other
                      nitrides like disordered ε-Fe$_3$−$_x$N(002) or
                      ζ-Fe$_2$N(102) can also be taken into account. Disordered
                      in this sense means the redistribution of mainly N atoms
                      within the structure and can be described by the transfer of
                      N from Fig. 2(b) and 2(c) Wyckoff site position in the
                      ε-Fe$_3$−$_x$N-phase.16 From symmetry reasons the
                      formation of ε-Fe$_3$−$_x$N is more probable since it
                      features the same type of structure (wurtzite) as GaN. The
                      strain caused by the lattice mismatch is supposed to relax
                      by generating misfit dislocations, as was shown in Ref. 13.},
      cin          = {HASYLAB(-2012)},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-H253)HASYLAB_-2012_-20130307$},
      pnm          = {DORIS Beamline BW1 (POF1-550)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-H253)POF1-BW1-20130405},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-H253)D-BW1-20150101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000272627700057},
      doi          = {10.1063/1.3271828},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/88666},
}