guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Comparing QCD+QED via full simulation versus the RM123 method: U-spin window contribution to ${a}_{\mu }^{\text{HVP}}$ > print |
| Home > Publications database > Comparing QCD+QED via full simulation versus the RM123 method: U-spin window contribution to ${a}_{\mu }^{\text{HVP}}$ > print |
| 001 | 642904 | ||
| 005 | 20260209140328.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1007/JHEP10(2025)158 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a RC:2025zoa |2 INSPIRETeX |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a inspire:2938320 |2 inspire |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1126-6708 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1029-8479 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1127-2236 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a arXiv:2506.19770 |2 arXiv |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3204/PUBDB-2025-05700 |2 datacite_doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a openalex:W4415346017 |2 openalex |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a PUBDB-2025-05700 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 530 |
| 088 | _ | _ | |a arXiv:2506.19770 |2 arXiv |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Altherr, A. |0 0000-0001-9703-5506 |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Comparing QCD+QED via full simulation versus the RM123 method: U-spin window contribution to ${a}_{\mu }^{\text{HVP}}$ |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Heidelberg |c 2025 |b Springer |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1769780706_2454242 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a 41 pages, 8 figures, 16 tables |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Electromagnetic corrections to hadronic vacuum polarization contribute significantly to the uncertainty of the Standard Model prediction of the muon anomaly, which poses conceptual and numerical challenges for ab initio lattice determinations. In this study, we compute the non-singlet contribution from intermediate Euclidean current separations in quantum chromo- and electrodynamics (QCD+QED) using C$^{⋆}$ boundary conditions in two ways: either non-perturbatively by sampling the joint probability distribution directly or by perturbatively expanding from an isospin-symmetric theory. This allows us to compare the predictions and their uncertainties at a fixed lattice spacing and volume, including fully the sea quarks effects in both cases. Treating carefully the uncertainty due to tuning to the same renormalized theory with N$_{f}$ = 1 + 2 + 1 quarks, albeit with unphysical masses, we find it advantageous to simulate the full QCD+QED distribution given a fixed number of samples. This study lays the ground-work for further applications of C$^{⋆}$ boundary conditions to study QCD+QED at the physical point, essential for the next generation of precision tests of the Standard Model.[graphic not available: see fulltext] |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF4-611) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-611 |c POF4-611 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a GRK 2575 - GRK 2575: Überdenken der Quantenfeldtheorie (417533893) |0 G:(GEPRIS)417533893 |c 417533893 |x 1 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, INSPIRE, Journals: bib-pubdb1.desy.de |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Lattice QCD |2 autogen |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Hadronic Spectroscopy |2 autogen |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Structure and Interactions |2 autogen |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Algorithms and Theoretical Developments |2 autogen |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Lattice Quantum Field Theory |2 autogen |
| 693 | _ | _ | |0 EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101 |5 EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101 |e No specific instrument |x 0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Campos, I. |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1026171 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Cotellucci, A. |0 0000-0002-0028-5849 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gruber, Roman |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Harris, T. |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1018328 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Komijani, J. |0 0000-0002-6943-8735 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Margari, F. |0 0000-0003-2155-7679 |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Marinkovic, M. K. |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1093373 |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Parato, L. |0 0000-0001-7500-6747 |b 8 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Patella, A. |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1084557 |b 9 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Rosso, S. |0 0009-0008-6734-4883 |b 10 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Tantalo, N. |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1012039 |b 11 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Tavella, P. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 12 |e Corresponding author |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a RC⋆ Collaboration |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 13 |e Collaboration author |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1007/JHEP10(2025)158 |g Vol. 10, no. 10, p. 158 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2027350-2 |n 10 |p 158 |t Journal of high energy physics |v 10 |y 2025 |x 1126-6708 |
| 787 | 0 | _ | |a Altherr, A. et.al. |d Heidelberg : Springer, 2025 |i IsParent |0 PUBDB-2026-00609 |r arXiv:2506.19770 |t Comparing QCD+QED via full simulation versus the RM123 method: U-spin window contribution to ${a}_{\mu }^{\text{HVP}}$ |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/642904/files/JHEP10%282025%29158.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/642904/files/JHEP10%282025%29158.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:bib-pubdb1.desy.de:642904 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 1 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1026171 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 4 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1018328 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 7 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1093373 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron |0 I:(DE-588b)2008985-5 |k DESY |b 9 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1084557 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 9 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1084557 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Materie |l Matter and the Universe |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-610 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-611 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-600 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Fundamental Particles and Forces |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2025 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b J HIGH ENERGY PHYS : 2022 |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b J HIGH ENERGY PHYS : 2022 |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2023-05-02T09:05:11Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2023-05-02T09:05:11Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0571 |2 StatID |b SCOAP3 sponsored Journal |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a National-Konsortium |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430 |2 StatID |d 2024-12-16 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2024-12-16 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review |d 2023-05-02T09:05:11Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a SCOAP3 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0570 |2 StatID |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-H253)Z_ZPPT-20210408 |k Z_ZPPT |l Zeuthen Particle PhysicsTheory |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-H253)Z_ZPPT-20210408 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|