% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Weber:642287,
author = {Weber, Tom},
othercontributors = {Borras, Kerstin and Mathey, Ludwig and Schäfer, Ina},
title = {{C}onstructing and {B}enchmarking {N}oise {M}odels for
{Q}uantum {C}omputing},
school = {University of Hamburg},
type = {Dissertation},
reportid = {PUBDB-2025-05458},
pages = {153},
year = {2024},
note = {Dissertation, University of Hamburg, 2024},
abstract = {Context: The main obstacle of quantum computing on its way
to scalability is the noisy nature of current hardware.
Various types of errors lead to incorrect computational
results,and measures such as quantum error mitigation are
needed to counteract these errors. Many error mitigation
techniques require a thorough understanding of the noise and
its impact on computations. Therefore, accurate noise models
are indispensable to facilitate meaningful quantum computing
in the near future. They also enable realistic simulations
of quantum devices. Since these devices are currently
limited and quantum computing is expensive, researchers
typically rely on simulations for testing their
algorithms.Objective: In this thesis, we aim to construct a
realistic noise model for quantum computing and optimise its
model parameters. The model construction should build on the
underlying physical processes, and the number of parameters
should scale well with the system size. We also address the
evaluation and comparison of different noise models by
benchmarks using quantum circuits specific to real-world
applications. Finally, we aim to develop useful graphical
representations of noise models based on the existing
quantum circuit model.Method: We present a benchmarking
framework for quantum computing noise models and evaluate it
based on benchmarking quality attributes from the
literature. Moreover, we construct a quantum computing noise
model and develop a training procedure for its parameters.
We analyse the parameters of the trained noise model and the
impact ofdifferent types of errors on computations. We
benchmark the noise model with the above approach and
compare it to a noise model provided by IBM’s software
development kit Qiskit. Finally, we develop an extension of
the quantum circuit model to represent noise
channels.Result: The benchmarks performed in this thesis
show that our noise model predicts noisy hardware behaviour
of IBM’s $ibmq_manila$ quantum device equally well as the
Qiskit model, if not better, based on quantum circuits
commonly used for variational quantum algorithms. Within the
trained noise model, readout error has the most detrimental
impact on computations. Our benchmarking approach satisfies
relevant quality criteria by choosing suitable quantum
circuits and objective functions to compare model
predictionsto hardware data. Moreover, the quantum circuit
model can be extended meaningfully by noise
channels.Conclusion: Our benchmarking approach is suitable
for evaluating and comparing quantum computing noise models.
In future work, volumetric benchmarks should be performed
for various noise models and application contexts. The
parameter optimisation based on learning with training
circuits yields accurate noise models and shows the
importance of mitigating measurement error. Different
optimisation algorithms and quantum circuits should be
explored, and more types of noise should be incorporated
into the noise model.},
cin = {CMS},
cid = {I:(DE-H253)CMS-20120731},
pnm = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF4-611) /
HIDSS-0002 - DASHH: Data Science in Hamburg - Helmholtz
Graduate School for the Structure of Matter
$(2019_IVF-HIDSS-0002)$},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-611 / $G:(DE-HGF)2019_IVF-HIDSS-0002$},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
urn = {urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-ediss-125184},
doi = {10.3204/PUBDB-2025-05458},
url = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/642287},
}