% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Dahln:641973,
      author       = {Dahlén, Benjamin and Löschner, Maximilian and Mękała,
                      Krzysztof and Reuter, Jürgen and Stylianou, Panagiotis},
      title        = {{EVA}luation of the {E}quivalent {V}ector boson
                      {A}pproximation at highest energy colliders},
      journal      = {Journal of high energy physics},
      volume       = {11},
      number       = {11},
      issn         = {1126-6708},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2025-05260, arXiv:2507.19285. DESY-25-104.
                      COMETA-2025-29},
      pages        = {002},
      year         = {2025},
      note         = {cc-by, JHEP11(2025)002. 26 pages, 15 figures, v2: version
                      published in JHEP},
      abstract     = {Collider processes at the highest available partonic
                      center-of-mass energies — 10 TeV and above — exhibit a
                      new regime of electroweak interactions where electroweak
                      gauge bosons mostly act as quasi-massless partons in vector
                      boson fusion processes. We scrutinize these processes using
                      the Equivalent Vector boson Approximation (EVA) based on its
                      implementation in the Monte Carlo generator framework
                      Whizard. Using a variety of important physics processes,
                      including top pairs, Higgs pairs, neutrino pairs, and vector
                      boson pairs, we study the behavior of processes initiated by
                      transverse and longitudinal vector bosons, both W and Z
                      induced. By considering several distributions for each
                      process, we conclude that: there is no universal,
                      process-independent prescription which minimizes the
                      discrepancies between EVA- and matrix-element-based
                      predictions; even by resorting to process-by-process
                      prescriptions, we typically observe significant
                      observable-dependent effects; the uncertainties associated
                      with parameter dependencies in the EVA can be as large as
                      $\mathcal{O}(100\\%)$, and can only possibly be reduced by
                      careful process-dependent kinematical selections.},
      keywords     = {Electroweak Precision Physics (autogen) / Higher Order
                      Electroweak Calculations (autogen)},
      cin          = {T},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)T-20120731},
      pnm          = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF4-611) / DFG
                      project G:(GEPRIS)390833306 - EXC 2121: Quantum Universe
                      (390833306) / DFG project G:(GEPRIS)491245950 -
                      Open-Access-Publikationskosten / 2025-2027 / DESY Hamburg
                      (491245950)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-611 / G:(GEPRIS)390833306 /
                      G:(GEPRIS)491245950},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      eprint       = {2507.19285},
      howpublished = {arXiv:2507.19285},
      archivePrefix = {arXiv},
      SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:2507.19285;\%\%$},
      doi          = {10.1007/JHEP11(2025)002},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/641973},
}