% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wang:640691,
author = {Wang, Xiaoyang and Chai, Yahui and Feng, Xu and Guo, Yibin
and Jansen, Karl and Tueysuez, Cenk},
title = {{I}maginary {H}amiltonian variational {A}nsatz for
combinatorial optimization problems},
journal = {Physical review / A},
volume = {111},
number = {3},
issn = {2469-9926},
address = {Woodbury, NY},
publisher = {Inst.},
reportid = {PUBDB-2025-04831, arXiv:2408.09083. RIKEN-iTHEMS-Report-25},
pages = {032612},
year = {2025},
note = {24 pages, 17 figures},
abstract = {Obtaining exact solutions to combinatorial optimization
problems using classical computing is computationally
expensive. The current tenet in the field is that quantum
computers can address these problems more efficiently. While
promising algorithms require fault-tolerant quantum
hardware, variational algorithms have emerged as viable
candidates for near-term devices. The success of these
algorithms hinges on multiple factors, with the design of
the Ansatz being of the utmost importance. It is known that
popular approaches such as the quantum approximate
optimization algorithm (QAOA) and quantum annealing suffer
from adiabatic bottlenecks, which lead to either larger
circuit depth or evolution time. On the other hand, the
evolution time of imaginary-time evolution is bounded by the
inverse energy gap of the Hamiltonian, which is constant for
most noncritical physical systems. In this work we propose
an imaginary Hamiltonian variational Ansatz (iHVA) inspired
by quantum imaginary-time evolution to solve the MaxCut
problem. We introduce a tree arrangement of the parametrized
quantum gates, enabling the exact solution of arbitrary tree
graphs using the one-round iHVA. For randomly generated
D-regular graphs, we numerically demonstrate that the iHVA
solves the MaxCut problem with a small constant number of
rounds and sublinear depth, outperforming the QAOA, which
requires rounds increasing with the graph size. Furthermore,
our Ansatz solves the MaxCut problem exactly for graphs with
up to 24 nodes and D≤5, whereas only approximate solutions
can be derived by the classical near-optimal
Goemans-Williamson algorithm. We validate our simulated
results with hardware demonstrations on a graph with 67
nodes.},
cin = {CQTA},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-H253)CQTA-20221102},
pnm = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF4-611)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-611},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
eprint = {2408.09083},
howpublished = {arXiv:2408.09083},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:2408.09083;\%\%$},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.111.032612},
url = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/640691},
}