% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Papathanasiou:639274,
      author       = {Papathanasiou, Georgios and Weinzierl, Stefan and Wu,
                      Konglong and Zhang, Yang},
      title        = {{R}ationalisation of multiple square roots in {F}eynman
                      integrals},
      journal      = {Journal of high energy physics},
      volume       = {05},
      number       = {5},
      issn         = {1126-6708},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2025-04375, arXiv:2501.07490. DESY-25-001.
                      MITP-25-004. USTC-ICTS/PCFT-24-28},
      pages        = {=78},
      year         = {2025},
      note         = {26 pages},
      abstract     = {Feynman integrals are very often computed from their
                      differential equations. It is not uncommon that the
                      ε-factorised differential equation contains only dlog-forms
                      with algebraic arguments, where the algebraic part is given
                      by (multiple) square roots. It is well-known that if all
                      square roots are simultaneously rationalisable, the Feynman
                      integrals can be expressed in terms of multiple
                      polylogarithms. This is a sufficient, but not a necessary
                      criterium. In this paper we investigate weaker requirements.
                      We discuss under which conditions we may use different
                      rationalisations in different parts of the calculation. In
                      particular we show that we may use different
                      rationalisations if they correspond to different
                      parameterisations of the same integration path. We present a
                      non-trivial example — the one-loop pentagon function with
                      three adjacent massive external legs involving seven square
                      roots — where this technique can be used to express the
                      result in terms of multiple polylogarithms.},
      keywords     = {Electroweak Precision Physics (autogen) / Higher-Order
                      Perturbative Calculations (autogen)},
      cin          = {T},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)T-20120731},
      pnm          = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF4-611) / DFG
                      project G:(GEPRIS)390783311 - EXC 2094: ORIGINS: Vom
                      Ursprung des Universums bis zu den ersten Bausteinen des
                      Lebens (390783311)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-611 / G:(GEPRIS)390783311},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      eprint       = {2501.07490},
      howpublished = {arXiv:2501.07490},
      archivePrefix = {arXiv},
      SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:2501.07490;\%\%$},
      doi          = {10.1007/JHEP05(2025)078},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/639274},
}