% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Song:619037,
author = {Song, Deheng and Eckner, Christopher and Gordon, Chris and
Calore, Francesca and Macias, Oscar and Abazajian, Kevork N.
and Horiuchi, Shunsaku and Kaplinghat, Manoj and Pohl,
Martin},
title = {{R}obust inference of the {G}alactic {C}entre gamma-ray
excess spatial properties},
journal = {Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
volume = {530},
number = {4},
issn = {0035-8711},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
reportid = {PUBDB-2024-07337, arXiv:2402.05449. LAPTH-009/24},
pages = {4395-4411},
year = {2024},
note = {2024MNRAS.530.4395S. 21 pages, 11 figures},
abstract = {The gamma-ray Fermi-LAT Galactic Centre excess (GCE) has
puzzled scientists for over 15 yr. Despite ongoing debates
about its properties, and especially its spatial
distribution, its nature remains elusive. We scrutinize how
the estimated spatial morphology of this excess depends on
models for the Galactic diffuse emission, focusing
particularly on the extent to which the Galactic plane and
point sources are masked. Our main aim is to compare a
spherically symmetric morphology – potentially arising
from the annihilation of dark matter (DM) particles – with
a boxy morphology – expected if faint unresolved sources
in the Galactic bulge dominate the excess emission. Recent
claims favouring a DM-motivated template for the GCE are
shown to rely on a specific Galactic bulge template, which
performs worse than other templates for the Galactic bulge.
We find that a non-parametric model of the Galactic bulge
derived from the VISTA Variables in the Via Lactea survey
results in a significantly better fit for the GCE than
DM-motivated templates. This result is independent of
whether a galprop-based model or a more non-parametric
ring-based model is used to describe the diffuse Galactic
emission. This conclusion remains true even when additional
freedom is added in the background models, allowing for
non-parametric modulation of the model components and
substantially improving the fit quality. When adopted,
optimized background models provide robust results in terms
of preference for a boxy bulge morphology for the GCE,
regardless of the mask applied to the Galactic plane.},
keywords = {background: model (INSPIRE) / galaxy: model (INSPIRE) /
dark matter: annihilation (INSPIRE) / symmetry: rotation
(INSPIRE) / gamma ray: emission (INSPIRE) / modulation
(INSPIRE) / spatial distribution (INSPIRE) / quality
(INSPIRE) / GLAST (INSPIRE) / astroparticle physics
(autogen) / pulsars: general (autogen) / Galaxy: bulge
(autogen) / local interstellar matter (autogen) / dark
matter (autogen) / gamma-rays: diffuse background (autogen)},
cin = {$Z_THAT$},
ddc = {520},
cid = {$I:(DE-H253)Z_THAT-20210408$},
pnm = {613 - Matter and Radiation from the Universe (POF4-613) /
SMASH - Machine learning for Sciences and Humanities
(101081355) / EOSC Future - EOSC Future (101017536)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-613 / G:(EU-Grant)101081355 /
G:(EU-Grant)101017536},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
eprint = {2402.05449},
howpublished = {arXiv:2402.05449},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:2402.05449;\%\%$},
UT = {WOS:001215834400005},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae923},
url = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/619037},
}