% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Tavakkoly:614733,
      author       = {Tavakkoly, Marziyeh and Chalupsky, Jaromir and Hajkova,
                      Vera and Hillert, Wolfgang and Jelinek, Simon and Juha,
                      Libor and Makita, Mikako and Mazza, Tommaso and Meyer,
                      Michael and Montano, Jacobo and Sinn, Harald and Vozda,
                      Vojtech and Vannoni, Maurizio},
      title        = {{C}omparing single-shot damage thresholds of boron carbide
                      and silicon at the {E}uropean {XFEL}},
      journal      = {Journal of synchrotron radiation},
      volume       = {31},
      number       = {5},
      issn         = {1600-5775},
      address      = {[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2024-05953},
      pages        = {1067-1070},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Xray free-electron lasers (XFELs) enable experiments that
                      would have beenimpractical or impossible at conventional
                      X-ray laser facilities. Indeed, moreXFEL facilities are
                      being built and planned, with their aim to deliver
                      largerpulse energies and higher peak brilliance. While
                      seeking to increase the pulsepower, it is quintessential to
                      consider the maximum pulse fluence that a
                      grazingincidenceFEL mirror can withstand. To address this
                      issue, several studies wereconducted on grazing-incidence
                      damage by soft X-ray FEL pulses at theEuropean XFEL
                      facility. Boron carbide (B4C) coatings on polished
                      siliconsubstrate were investigated using 1 keV photon
                      energy, similar to the X-raymirrors currently installed at
                      the soft X-ray beamlines (SASE3). The purpose ofthis study
                      is to compare the damage threshold of B4C and Si to
                      determine theadvantages, tolerance and limits of using B4C
                      coatings.},
      cin          = {$XFEL_DO_ID_XRO$ / MXL},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-H253)XFEL_DO_ID_XRO-20210408$ /
                      I:(DE-H253)MXL-20160301},
      pnm          = {621 - Accelerator Research and Development (POF4-621) /
                      6G13 - Accelerator of European XFEL (POF4-6G13)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-621 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-6G13},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-H253)XFEL-Exp-20150101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:39182203},
      UT           = {WOS:001362324700009},
      doi          = {10.1107/S1600577524007318},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/614733},
}