% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Maliuta:596111,
      author       = {Maliuta, Mariia and Senkovska, Irena and Romaka, Vitaliy
                      and Roslova, Mariia and Huang, Zhehao and Petkov, Petko and
                      Bon, Volodymyr and Kaskel, Stefan},
      title        = {{F}lexibility in {DUT}-8({C}u) {M}etal–{O}rganic
                      {F}ramework: {I}mpact of {C}luster, {S}tress, {H}istory, and
                      {H}ierarchical {T}exture},
      journal      = {CCS Chemistry},
      volume       = {5},
      number       = {10},
      issn         = {2096-5745},
      address      = {Beijing},
      publisher    = {Chinese Chemical Society},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2023-06059},
      pages        = {2225 - 2236},
      year         = {2023},
      abstract     = {The flexibility of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)
                      featuring stimuli-responsive structural transitions is often
                      governed not only by the chemical composition and topology
                      but also by orthogonal factors such as particle size,
                      desolvation method, and history of the sample. A precise
                      understanding of the mechanism behind such observations has
                      been lacking up to now, and there are still substantial open
                      questions concerning the impact of sample treatment history.
                      The DUT-8(M) family ([M$_2$(2,6-ndc)2(dabco)]$_n$, 2,6-ndc =
                      2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylate, dabco =
                      1,4-diazabicyclo-[2.2.2]-octane), encompasses isostructural
                      compounds based on Ni, Zn, Co, and Cu in the cluster node
                      and is representative of pillared layer MOFs, often showing
                      flexible behavior. In this contribution, we discuss a
                      possible explanation for the differences in flexibility
                      observed in desolvated phases of DUT-8(Cu). Theoretical
                      calculations and crystallographic data shed light on the
                      preferred formation of interpenetrated confined closed pore
                      phases in DUT-8(Cu) in contrast to DUT-8(Ni, Co, Zn) where
                      the closed pore phases are formed.},
      cin          = {DOOR ; HAS-User},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)HAS-User-20120731},
      pnm          = {6G3 - PETRA III (DESY) (POF4-6G3) / FS-Proposal:
                      II-20220732 (II-20220732) / DFG project 323224382 - Synthese
                      schaltbarer MOFs für Gas- und Flüssigphasentrennungen:
                      Maßgeschneiderte Modellmaterialien für das Verständnis
                      der Selektivität (323224382)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-6G3 / G:(DE-H253)II-20220732 /
                      G:(GEPRIS)323224382},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-H253)P-P23-20150101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001038074000001},
      doi          = {10.31635/ccschem.023.202303056},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/596111},
}