% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@MISC{Observatory:572892,
      author       = {Consortium, Cherenkov Telescope Array},
      editor       = {Observatory, Cherenkov Telescope Array},
      title        = {{CTAO} {I}nstrument {R}esponse {F}unctions - prod5 version
                      v0.1},
      publisher    = {Zenodo},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2023-00798},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {CTAO Instrument Response Functions - prod5 version v0.1 The
                      CTA Observatory (CTAO) will provide very wide energy range
                      and excellent angular resolution and sensitivity in
                      comparison to any existing gamma-ray detector. Energies down
                      to 20 GeV will allow CTAO to study the most distant objects.
                      Energies up to 300 TeV will push CTAO beyond the edge of the
                      known electromagnetic spectrum, providing a completely new
                      view of the sky. This data repository provides access to
                      performance evaluation and instrument response functions
                      (IRFs) for CTA. IRF version: prod5 v0.1 Telescope model and
                      site configuration: prod5-model Publication date: Sep 2021
                      Archived webpage with performance figures included: CTAO
                      Performance Description (file Website.md) Licence: this work
                      is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                      International License . Please use the contact address
                      open-data@cta-observatory.org for any inquiries. Citation
                      and Acknowledgements: In cases for which the CTA instrument
                      response functions are used in a research project, we ask to
                      add the following acknowledgement in any resulting
                      publication: 'This research has made use of the CTA
                      instrument response functions provided by the CTA Consortium
                      and Observatory, see
                      https://www.ctao-observatory.org/science/cta-performance/
                      (version prod5 v0.1; [citation]) for more details.' Please
                      use the following BibTex Entry for [citation] in the
                      reference section of your publication:
                      https://zenodo.org/record/5499840/export/hx Description
                      Monte Carlo Simulations: The performance values are derived
                      from detailed Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the CTA
                      instrument based on the CORSIKA air shower code (v7.71, with
                      the hadronic interaction models QGSjet-II-04 and URQMD, [1])
                      and telescope simulation tool $sim_telarray$ [2]. A power-
                      law gamma-ray spectrum with photon index 2.62 was assumed in
                      the calculations, although none of the instrument response
                      functions (e.g. differential flux sensitivities, effective
                      areas, angular or energy resolutions) depends on the assumed
                      spectral shape of the gamma-ray source. Background
                      cosmic-ray spectra of proton and electron/positron particle
                      types are modelled according to recent measurements from
                      cosmic-ray instruments. Nominal telescope pointing is
                      assumed, with all telescopes pointing directions parallel to
                      each other (performance estimation for other pointing modes,
                      e.g. divergent pointing will be provided in the future).
                      Performance estimations are available for three zenith
                      angles (20 deg, 40 deg, and 60 deg), and for each zenith
                      angle for two different azimuth angles (corresponding to
                      pointing towards the magnetic North and South). There are
                      significant performance differences found between the two
                      azimuthal pointing directions (especially for the Northern
                      site) as the impact of the geomagnetic field is large enough
                      to influence notably the air shower development. For general
                      studies, the use of the azimuth-averaged instrument response
                      functions is recommended. Instrument Response Functions
                      (IRFs): The analysis has been tuned to maximize the
                      performance in terms of flux sensitivity. The optimal
                      analysis cuts depend on the duration of the observation,
                      therefore the IRFs are provided for 3 different observation
                      times, from 0.5 to 50 h. IRFs are provided as binned
                      histogram or FITS tables. It should be stressed, that the
                      full potential of CTA in terms of angular and energy
                      resolution is not revealed by these IRFS, due to the focus
                      on the optimisation for best flux sensitivity. In general
                      all histograms are binned with a 0.2-binning on the
                      logarithmic energy axis (5 bins per decade); some selected
                      histograms (e.g. effective areas or energy migration
                      matrices) are provided with a finer binning. Effective area
                      and energy migration matrix are available in a double
                      version: one for the case in which there is no a priori
                      knowledge of the true direction of incoming gamma rays (e.g.
                      for the observation of diffuse sources), and another for
                      observations of point-like objects (including among the
                      analysis cuts one on the angle between the true and the
                      reconstructed gamma-ray direction). IRFs are provided in
                      ROOT format and as FITS tables. The FITS tables can be used
                      directly as input to science analysis tools. The values of
                      the IRFs are identical for the different file format, with
                      one exception: the angular point-spread function is
                      approximated by a Gaussian function for the FITS tables,
                      while the ROOT files contain the full distribution.
                      Telescope layouts are preliminary and subject to change. The
                      following array layouts (Alpha configuration) have been
                      assumed: CTA South with 14 MSTs and 37 SSTs (see
                      [figure](figures/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-South-Alpha-Layout.png))
                      CTA North with 4 LSTs and 9 MSTs (see
                      [figure](figures/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-North-Alpha-Layout.png))
                      Two zip files are uploaded: full archive with IRFs in FITS
                      and ROOT format: cta-prod5-zenodo-v0.1.zip partial archive
                      with IRFs in FITS format only:
                      cta-prod5-zenodo-fitsonly-v0.1.zip File Naming (examples):
                      Prod5-North-40deg-AverageAz-4LSTs09MSTs.18000s-v0.1.root:
                      IRF for CTA Northern site on La Palma, 40 deg zenith angle,
                      azimuth-averaged pointing, optimised for 5 hours of
                      observation time
                      Prod5-South-20deg-AverageAz-14MSTs37SSTs.180000s-v0.1.fits.gz:
                      IRF for CTA Southern site in Paranal, 20 deg zenith angle,
                      azimuth-averaged pointing, optimised for 50 hours of
                      observation time List of files: FITS format:
                      fits/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-North-20deg.FITS.tar.gz
                      fits/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-North-40deg.FITS.tar.gz
                      fits/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-North-60deg.FITS.tar.gz
                      fits/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-South-20deg.FITS.tar.gz
                      fits/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-South-40deg.FITS.tar.gz
                      fits/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-South-60deg.FITS.tar.gz ROOT
                      format: root/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-North-20deg.tar.gz
                      root/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-North-40deg.tar.gz
                      root/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-North-60deg.tar.gz
                      root/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-South-20deg.tar.gz
                      root/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-South-40deg.tar.gz
                      root/CTA-Performance-prod5-v0.1-South-60deg.tar.gz IRFs for
                      subarrays of e.g., MSTs only are in the files named
                      MSTSubArray (similar for all other telescope types).
                      References [1] https://www.ikp.kit.edu/corsika/ [2]
                      Bernloehr, K. 2008, Astroparticle Physics, 30, 149
                      Acknowledgements We would like to thank the computing
                      centres that provided resources for the generation of the
                      Prod 5 Instrument Response Functions (IRFs): CAMK, Nicolaus
                      Copernicus Astronomical Center, Warsaw, Poland CIEMAT-LCG2,
                      CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain CYFRONET-LCG2, ACC CYFRONET AGH,
                      Cracow, Poland DESY-ZN, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron,
                      Standort Zeuthen, Germany GRIF, Grille de Recherche d’Ile
                      de France, Paris, France IN2P3-CC, Centre de Calcul de
                      l’IN2P3, Villeurbanne, France IN2P3-CPPM, Centre de
                      Physique des Particules de Marseille, Marseille, France
                      IN2P3-LAPP, Laboratoire d Annecy de Physique des Particules,
                      Annecy, France INFN-FRASCATI, INFN Frascati, Frascati, Italy
                      INFN-T1, CNAF INFN, Bologna, Italy INFN-TORINO, INFN Torino,
                      Torino, Italy MPIK, Heidelberg, Germany OBSPM, Observatoire
                      de Paris Meudon, Paris, France PIC, port d’informacio
                      cientifica, Bellaterra, Spain $prague_cesnet_lcg2,$ CESNET,
                      Prague, Czech Republic praguelcg2, FZU Prague, Prague, Czech
                      Republic UKI-NORTHGRID-LANCS-HEP, Lancaster University,
                      United Kingdom},
      keywords     = {gamma-ray astronomy (Other) / CTA (Other)},
      cin          = {$Z_CTA$},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-H253)Z_CTA-20210408$},
      pnm          = {613 - Matter and Radiation from the Universe (POF4-613)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-613},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-H253)CTA-20150101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)32},
      doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.5499840},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/572892},
}