% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Tumasyan:483132,
      author       = {Tumasyan, Armen and others},
      collaboration = {{CMS Collaboration}},
      title        = {{N}uclear modification of $\Upsilon$ states in p{P}b
                      collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{{NN}}}$ = 5.02 {T}e{V}},
      journal      = {Physics letters / B},
      volume       = {835},
      issn         = {0370-2693},
      address      = {Amsterdam},
      publisher    = {North-Holland Publ.},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2022-05123, arXiv:2202.11807. CMS-HIN-18-005.
                      CERN-EP-2020-181},
      pages        = {137397},
      year         = {2022},
      note         = {All figures and tables can be found at
                      http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIN-18-005
                      (CMS Public Pages)},
      abstract     = {Production cross sections of $\Upsilon$(1S),
                      $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) states decaying into
                      \muplusmuminus in proton-lead (pPb) collisions are reported
                      using data collected by the CMS experiment
                      at$\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. A comparison is made
                      with corresponding cross sections obtained with pp data
                      measured at the same collision energy and scaled by the Pb
                      nucleus mass number. The nuclear modification factor for
                      $\Upsilon$(1S) is found to be $R_\mathrm{pPb}(\Upsilon(1S))$
                      = 0.806 $\pm$ 0.024 (stat) $\pm$ 0.059 (syst). Similar
                      results for the excited states indicate a sequential
                      suppression pattern, such that $R_\mathrm{pPb}(\Upsilon(1S))
                      \gt R_\mathrm{pPb}(\Upsilon(2S)) \gt
                      R_\mathrm{pPb}(\Upsilon(3S))$. The suppression is much less
                      pronounced in pPb than in PbPb collisions, and independent
                      of transverse momentum $p_\mathrm{T}^\Upsilon$ and
                      center-of-mass rapidity $y_\mathrm{CM}^\Upsilon$ of the
                      individual $\Upsilon$ state in the studied range
                      $p_\mathrm{T}^\Upsilon \lt $ 30 GeV$/c$ and $\vert
                      y_\mathrm{CM}^\Upsilon\vert \lt$ 1.93. Models that
                      incorporate sequential suppression of bottomonia in pPb
                      collisions are in better agreement with the data than those
                      which only assume initial-state modifications.},
      keywords     = {p nucleus: interaction (INSPIRE) / lead (INSPIRE) /
                      nucleus: mass number (INSPIRE) / suppression (INSPIRE) /
                      Upsilon(9460): leptonic decay (INSPIRE) / Upsilon(10020):
                      leptonic decay (INSPIRE) / Upsilon(10355): leptonic decay
                      (INSPIRE) / muon: pair production (INSPIRE) / initial state
                      (INSPIRE) / excited state (INSPIRE) / nuclear matter: effect
                      (INSPIRE) / channel cross section: branching ratio: measured
                      (INSPIRE) / transverse momentum dependence (INSPIRE) /
                      rapidity dependence (INSPIRE) / CMS (INSPIRE) / CERN LHC
                      Coll (INSPIRE) / experimental results (INSPIRE) / 5020
                      GeV-cms/nucleon (INSPIRE)},
      cin          = {CMS},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)CMS-20120731},
      pnm          = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF4-611) / DFG
                      project 390833306 - EXC 2121: Quantum Universe (390833306)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-611 / G:(GEPRIS)390833306},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-H253)LHC-Exp-CMS-20150101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      eprint       = {2202.11807},
      howpublished = {arXiv:2202.11807},
      archivePrefix = {arXiv},
      SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:2202.11807;\%\%$},
      UT           = {WOS:000912783600001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137397},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/483132},
}