% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Fritsch:472121,
      author       = {Fritsch, Charlotte},
      othercontributors = {Ehrenberg, Helmut and Powell, Annie},
      title        = {{M}icrostructural characterization and multiscale ionic
                      conductivity in lithium and sodium-based solid state
                      electrolytes},
      school       = {Karlsruhe Institute of Technology},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      publisher    = {KIT},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2021-04844},
      pages        = {156},
      year         = {2021},
      note         = {Dissertation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2021},
      abstract     = {In order to meet the increasing need for energy storage
                      systems in consumer devices, electric vehicles and
                      stationary energy storage devices, the existing battery
                      technologies are constantly being further developed. An
                      important criterion for the performance of the battery is
                      its energy density. Even if the cathode accounts mostly for
                      the weight of a lithium ion battery cell, there is a
                      promising possibility of weight saving on the anode side by
                      replacing graphite with pure lithium metal. To this end, an
                      electrolyte needs to be developed that is stable against the
                      potential of the pure metal. Liquid electrolytes cannot meet
                      this requirement and also involve safety risks as
                      ammability. Solid-state electrolytes are supposed to enable
                      the use of a lithium-metal electrode. Additionally, due to
                      the scarcity of resources for lithium, sodium-based
                      technologies are being developed for use as stationary
                      energy storage devices. Thiophosphates feature the highest
                      ionic conductivities among all solid electrolytes. In many
                      cases, amorphous thiophosphates offer even higher
                      conductivities than their crystalline analogues and their
                      structure can differ, too. A structural investigation of
                      amorphous compounds may not be possible with a standard
                      X-ray analysis. However their local structure has to be
                      enlightened so that a reproducible synthesis can take place.
                      The solid electrolyte Na2P2S6 was synthesized via ball
                      milling in an amorphous state with subsequent
                      crystallization. The structure of the crystalline phase
                      differs markedly compared to the corresponding amorphous
                      phase. A combination of XRD-PDF analysis and 23Na/31P MAS
                      NMR spectroscopy measurements indicate that single PS30-4
                      tetrahedra and corner-sharing tetrahedra are transformed to
                      edge-sharing-tetrahedra during crystallization of amorphous
                      Na2P2S6 to crystalline Na2P2S6. Impedance spectroscopy shows
                      that amorphous Na2P2S6 has a conductivity of 5.710-8 S cm-1
                      which is three orders of magnitude higher than crystalline
                      Na2P2S6 (2.6 10-11 S cm-1). The higher conductivity can also
                      be recovered by ball milling crystalline Na2P2S6, inducing a
                      reamorphization. Lithium Lanthanum Zirconium oxide (LLZO)
                      exhibits a high ionic conductivity and stability against
                      lithium metal and is therefore a promising candidate as
                      solid state electrolyte. Yet, specifcations on its
                      conductivity are often not reliable and spread widely.
                      Attempts are made to attribute the differences in reported
                      conductivities to the different substituents, sintering
                      times or surface passivations. A microstructural comparison
                      of four differently substituted samples is performed to
                      elucidate the reasons for the different conductivities.
                      X-ray diffraction revealed that commercial LLZO samples
                      crystallize in the hydrogarnet structure (space group No.
                      220), which is described for the first time with a
                      substituent on Zr and La sites. Ball milling of Al3+, Nb5+,
                      Ta5+ and W6+ substituted LLZO results in a phase
                      transformation from the garnet structure into the
                      hydrogarnet structure with a lower symmetry. The
                      distribution of lithium ions in the hydrogarnet structure
                      differs from that in the garnet structure which was
                      investigated with 6Li MAS NMR and neutron diffraction. A
                      targeted conversion of the hydrogarnet structure into the
                      garnet structure is proved by calcining the material at 1100
                      °C for 10 h. With high-temperature X-ray diffraction, an
                      low thermal expansion of the hydrogarnet unit cell is
                      observed in comparison to the greater expansion of the
                      garnet unit cell. The ionic mobility of Li ions in the
                      hydrogarnet structure is examined by means of NMR, in
                      particular line shape analysis, relaxometry and pulsed-field
                      gradient NMR. This combination of techniques shows that the
                      mobility of lithium is significantly reduced on small length
                      scales. In combination with the structural analysis, this
                      can be traced back to the high occupancy of the Li3 position
                      in the hydogarnet structure, blocking long-range lithium
                      diffusion. However, it was not possible to access the
                      long-range mobility of Li in the hydrogarnet structure (at
                      25 °C). Therefore, the contribution of the ceramic
                      component to the total ionic conductivity of polymer
                      composite electrolytes is evaluated. The question whether
                      the long-range lithium mobility in the hydrogarnet structure
                      is lower compared to the garnet structure is assessed
                      without the necessity for sintering the LLZO to pellets.
                      Impedance spectroscopy shows a conductivity of 1.2 10-6 S
                      cm-1 for a composite electrolyte with a hydrogarnet
                      structure and 3.4 10-6 S cm-1 for a composite electrolyte
                      with a garnet structure. The higher Li mobility of the
                      garnet-based composite electrolyte compared to the
                      hydrogarnet-based electrolyte is verified with PFG-NMR
                      measurements of the diffusion coeffcient: 6.1 10-14 m2 s-1
                      (garnet), resp. 1.1 10-14 m2 s-1 (hydrogarnet). The measured
                      activation energy of dffusion is also higher in the
                      hydrogarnet composite. The conductivity results measured
                      with impedance spectroscopy are compared with commercial
                      composite electrolytes; a SiO2-ceramic-polymer and a purely
                      polymer-based electrolyte. The next step from optimizing a
                      solid state electrolyte in terms of ionic conductivity is to
                      look at its compatibility with the electrodes, here the
                      cathode. It is tested whether ball milling of LLZO with the
                      established cathode material Lithium Nickel Cobalt Manganese
                      oxide (NCM) results in a good contact of the two materials
                      and consequently a low Li ion diffusion barrier. The
                      interface between LLZO and NCM is investigated by X-ray
                      diffraction, 6Li MAS NMR and transmission electron
                      microscopy. A model system consisting of LLZO and NCM is
                      characterized with impedance spectroscopy for a lithium
                      diffusion barrier sandwiched between an auxiliary
                      electrolyte in order to separate the ionic conductivity from
                      the electrical. An evaluation of only the ionic conductivity
                      apart from the electrical conductivity is not possible due
                      to the high electrical conductivity of the auxiliary
                      electrolyte. The electrolyte Lithium Aluminum Titanium
                      Phosphate (LATP) is examined crystallographically against
                      the background of upscaling of the synthesis. If the process
                      is upscaled, local inhomogeneities of the educts can be
                      expected in a way that varying educt contents have an effect
                      on the product. This applies especially to phosphoric acid,
                      the concentration of which cannot be specified precisely due
                      to its hygroscopy. A Rietveld refinement analysis against
                      X-ray diffraction data of LATP with varying phosphoric acid
                      content during synthesis is performed. An excess of
                      phosphoric acid leads to the formation of AlPO4, which
                      impedes the ionic conductivity. Insufficient phosphoric acid
                      causes the formation LiTiOPO4. TiO2 is formed in this
                      material after a second sintering step. The findings in this
                      work contribute the understanding of structural changes in
                      solid electrolytes during processing and thus contribute to
                      the improvement of future solidstate batteries.},
      keywords     = {solid state electrolyte (Other) / garnet electrolyte
                      (Other) / hydrogarnet (Other)},
      cin          = {DOOR ; HAS-User / KIT},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)HAS-User-20120731 / I:(DE-H253)KIT-20130928},
      pnm          = {6G3 - PETRA III (DESY) (POF4-6G3)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-6G3},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-H253)P-P02.1-20150101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.5445/IR/1000133273},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/472121},
}