% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Aaboud:453443,
author = {Aaboud, M. and others},
collaboration = {{ATLAS Collaboration}},
title = {{D}etermination of jet calibration and energy resolution in
proton–proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 8~\hbox {{T}e{V}}$
using the {ATLAS} detector},
journal = {The European physical journal / C},
volume = {80},
number = {12},
issn = {1434-6052},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {PUBDB-2020-05248, arXiv:1910.04482. CERN-EP-2019-057},
pages = {1104 (1-81)},
year = {2020},
note = {110 pages in total, author list starting page 94, 58
figures, 7 tables, submitted to Eur. Phys. J. C. All figures
including auxiliary figures are available at
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/PERF-2014-02/},
abstract = {The jet energy scale, jet energy resolution, and their
systematic uncertainties are measured for jets reconstructed
with the ATLAS detector in 2012 using proton–proton data
produced at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV with an
integrated luminosity of $20 \, \hbox {fb}^{-1}$. Jets are
reconstructed from clusters of energy depositions in the
ATLAS calorimeters using the anti-$k_t$ algorithm. A jet
calibration scheme is applied in multiple steps, each
addressing specific effects including mitigation of
contributions from additional proton–proton collisions,
loss of energy in dead material, calorimeter
non-compensation, angular biases and other global jet
effects. The final calibration step uses several in situ
techniques and corrects for residual effects not captured by
the initial calibration. These analyses measure both the jet
energy scale and resolution by exploiting the transverse
momentum balance in $\gamma $ + jet, Z + jet, dijet, and
multijet events. A statistical combination of these
measurements is performed. In the central detector region,
the derived calibration has a precision better than 1\% for
jets with transverse momentum $150 \, \hbox {GeV} <
p_{{\mathrm {T}}}<$ 1500 GeV, and the relative energy
resolution is $(8.4\pm 0.6)\\%$ for $p_{{\mathrm {T}}}= 100
\, \hbox {GeV}$ and $(23\pm 2)\\%$ for $p_{{\mathrm {T}}}=
20 \, \hbox {GeV}$. The calibration scheme for jets with
radius parameter $R=1.0$, for which jets receive a dedicated
calibration of the jet mass, is also discussed.},
keywords = {p p: colliding beams (INSPIRE) / jet: calibration (INSPIRE)
/ p p: scattering (INSPIRE) / jet: energy resolution
(INSPIRE) / jet: multiple production (INSPIRE) / photon:
associated production (INSPIRE) / Z0: associated production
(INSPIRE) / jet: mass (INSPIRE) / ATLAS (INSPIRE) / CERN LHC
Coll (INSPIRE) / transverse momentum: missing-energy
(INSPIRE) / calorimeter (INSPIRE) / track data analysis: jet
(INSPIRE) / anti-kT algorithm (INSPIRE) / statistical
(INSPIRE) / resolution (INSPIRE) / cluster (INSPIRE) / dijet
(INSPIRE) / data analysis method (INSPIRE) / experimental
results (INSPIRE) / 8000 GeV-cms (INSPIRE)},
cin = {ATLAS},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-H253)ATLAS-20120731},
pnm = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF3-611)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-611},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-H253)LHC-Exp-ATLAS-20150101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
eprint = {1910.04482},
howpublished = {arXiv:1910.04482},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:1910.04482;\%\%$},
UT = {WOS:000598026400006},
doi = {10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08477-8},
url = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/453443},
}