% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@INBOOK{Stckelberger:436945,
      author       = {Stückelberger, Michael and Stückelberger, Christoph},
      title        = {{N}anotechnology and {E}thics in {D}ialogue},
      address      = {Berlin/Boston},
      publisher    = {De Gruyter},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2020-01223},
      isbn         = {9783110719932},
      pages        = {325-335},
      year         = {2021},
      comment      = {[Text] Ethics in nanotechnology / Voorde, Marcel H. van de
                      ; Jeswani, Gunjan , Berlin : De Gruyter, [2021],},
      booktitle     = {[Text] Ethics in nanotechnology /
                       Voorde, Marcel H. van de ; Jeswani,
                       Gunjan , Berlin : De Gruyter, [2021],},
      abstract     = {What is the relationship between nanotechnology and ethics
                      at present, andhow shall it be in future? A scientist with
                      focus on nanomaterials research and a theolo-gian with
                      specialization in ethics, son and father, explore answers in
                      form of a dialogue.They distinguish three ways, how size of
                      nanostructures can drive their functional ity:
                      surface-to-volume ratio, target size, and intrinsic
                      size-related properties. Each of these find applications in
                      nanotechnology that are elaborated based on examples from
                      silver nanoparticles to solar cells and natural
                      nanostructures in butterfly wings. How to evaluate specific
                      technologies with respect to ethics? Both agree on the
                      United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) as
                      generally applicable moral set beyond cultural or religious
                      points of view. Based on the SDG, the ethicist suggests four
                      rules to evaluate nanotechnology research. However, they
                      appear of little practical use to the scientist: embracing
                      all aspects of life, the SDG lack of specificity. Which role
                      should ethics, also institutionalized in ethics committees,
                      play in research? Too often, ethics committees play a
                      prohibitive role. Instead, a shift toward innovative ethics
                      is suggested in close interaction between ethicists and
                      scientists to actively drive research into directions for
                      the good of humanity.},
      cin          = {FS-PETRA},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)FS-PETRA-20140814},
      pnm          = {6214 - Nanoscience and Materials for Information Technology
                      (POF3-621)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-6214},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)7},
      doi          = {10.1515/9783110719932-014},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/436945},
}