% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Graupner:398869,
      author       = {Graupner, Nina and Müssig, Jörg},
      title        = {{C}ellulose {F}iber-{R}einforced {PLA} versus {PP}},
      journal      = {International journal of polymer science},
      volume       = {2017},
      issn         = {1687-9430},
      address      = {New York, NY},
      publisher    = {Hindawi},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2018-00220, I-20100278},
      pages        = {1 - 10},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {The present study focuses on a comparison between different
                      cellulose fiber-reinforced thermoplastics. Composites were
                      produced with 30 $mass-\%$ lyocell fibers and a PLA or PP
                      matrix with either an injection (IM) or compression molding
                      (CM) process. Significant reinforcement effects were
                      achieved for tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and Shore
                      D hardness by using lyocell as reinforcing fiber. These
                      values are significantly higher for PLA and its composites
                      compared to PP and PP-based composites. Investigations of
                      the fiber/matrix adhesion show a better bonding for lyocell
                      in PLA compared to PP, resulting in a more effective load
                      transfer from the matrix to the fiber. However, PLA is
                      brittle while PP shows a ductile stress-strain behavior. The
                      impact strength of PLA was drastically improved by adding
                      lyocell while the impact strength of PP decreased. CM and IM
                      composites do not show significant differences in fiber
                      orientation. Despite a better compaction of IM composites,
                      higher tensile strength values were achieved for CM samples
                      due to a higher fiber length.},
      cin          = {DOOR},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)HAS-User-20120731},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-H253)D-BW2-20150101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)29 / PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000405755900001},
      doi          = {10.1155/2017/6059183},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/398869},
}