% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Singer:317045,
author = {Singer, W. and Brinkmann, A. and Brinkmann, R. and Iversen,
J. and Matheisen, A. and Moeller, W. D. and Navitski, A. and
Reschke, D. and Schaffran, J. and Sulimov, A. and Walker, N.
and Weise, H. and Michelato, P. and Monaco, L. and Pagani,
C. and Wiencek, M.},
title = {{P}roduction of {S}uperconducting 1.3-{GH}z {C}avities for
the {E}uropean {X}-{R}ay {F}ree {E}lectron {L}aser},
journal = {Physical review accelerators and beams},
volume = {19},
number = {9},
issn = {2469-9888},
address = {College Park, MD},
publisher = {American Physical Society},
reportid = {PUBDB-2017-00386},
pages = {092001},
year = {2016},
abstract = {The production of over 800 1.3-GHz superconducting (SC)
cavities for the European X-ray Free Electron Laser (EXFEL),
the largest in the history of cavity fabrication, has now
been successfully completed. In the past, manufacturing of
SC resonators was only partly industrialized; the main
challenge for the EXFEL production was transferring the
high-performance surface treatment to industry. The
production was shared by the two companies RI Research
Instruments GmbH (RI) and Ettore Zanon S.p.A. (EZ) on the
principle of “build to print”. DESY provided the
high-purity niobium and NbTi for the resonators. Conformity
with the European Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) was
developed together with the contracted notified body TUEV
NORD. New or upgraded infrastructure has been established at
both companies. Series production and delivery of
fully-equipped cavities ready for cold rf testing was
started in December 2012, and finished in December 2015.
More than half the cavities delivered to DESY as specified
(referred to “as received”) fulfilled the EXFEL
specification. Further improvement of low-performing
cavities was achieved by supplementary surface treatment at
DESY or at the companies. The final achieved average
gradient exceeded the EXFEL specification by approximately
$25\%.$ In the following paper, experience with the 1.3-GHz
cavity production for EXFEL is reported and the main lessons
learned are discussed.},
cin = {MPL / MHF-sl / DIR / MKS / FLA / MPY},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-H253)MPL-20120731 / I:(DE-H253)MHF-sl-20120731 /
I:(DE-H253)DIR-20120806 / I:(DE-H253)MKS-20120806 /
I:(DE-H253)FLA-20120731 / I:(DE-H253)MPY-20120731},
pnm = {631 - Accelerator R $\&$ D (POF3-631) / 6G13 - XFEL
(POF3-622)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-631 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-6G13},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-H253)XFEL(machine)-20150101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000383252000002},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.092001},
url = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/317045},
}