% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Massimo:311051,
      author       = {Massimo, F. and Atzeni, S. and Marocchino, A.},
      title        = {{C}omparisons of {T}ime {E}xplicit {H}ybrid
                      {K}inetic-{F}luid {C}ode {A}rchitect for {P}lasma
                      {W}akefield {A}cceleration with a full {PIC} code},
      journal      = {Journal of computational physics},
      volume       = {327},
      issn         = {0021-9991},
      address      = {Amsterdam},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2016-04600},
      pages        = {841 - 850},
      year         = {2016},
      note         = {(c) Elsevier Inc.},
      abstract     = {Architect, a time explicit hybrid code designed to perform
                      quick simulations for electron driven plasma wakefield
                      acceleration, is described. In order to obtain beam quality
                      acceptable for applications, control of the
                      beam-plasma-dynamics is necessary. Particle in Cell (PIC)
                      codes represent the state-of-the-art technique to
                      investigate the underlying physics and possible experimental
                      scenarios; however PIC codes demand the necessity of heavy
                      computational resources. Architect code substantially
                      reduces the need for computational resources by using a
                      hybrid approach: relativistic electron bunches are treated
                      kinetically as in a PIC code and the background plasma as a
                      fluid. Cylindrical symmetry is assumed for the solution of
                      the electromagnetic fields and fluid equations. In this
                      paper both the underlying algorithms as well as a comparison
                      with a fully three dimensional particle in cell code are
                      reported. The comparison highlights the good agreement
                      between the two models up to the weakly non-linear regimes.
                      In highly non-linear regimes the two models only disagree in
                      a localized region, where the plasma electrons expelled by
                      the bunch close up at the end of the first plasma
                      oscillation.},
      cin          = {EuPRAXIA},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)EuPRAXIA-20160714},
      pnm          = {631 - Accelerator R $\&$ D (POF3-631) / EuPRAXIA - Proposal
                      for a Horizon 2020 Design Study on the “European Plasma
                      Research Accelerator with eXcellence In Applications“
                      (EuPRAXIA) (653782)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-631 / G:(EU-Grant)653782},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000386069200041},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.067},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/311051},
}