% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Contino:310789,
      author       = {Contino, Roberto and Falkowski, Adam and Goertz, Florian
                      and Grojean, Christophe and Riva, Francesco},
      title        = {{O}n the validity of the effective field theory approach to
                      {SM} precision tests},
      journal      = {Journal of high energy physics},
      volume       = {1607},
      number       = {7},
      issn         = {1029-8479},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2016-04412, DESY-16-067. arXiv:1604.06444},
      pages        = {144},
      year         = {2016},
      abstract     = {We discuss the conditions for an effective field theory
                      (EFT) to give an adequate low-energy description of an
                      underlying physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). Starting
                      from the EFT where the SM is extended by dimension-6
                      operators, experimental data can be used without further
                      assumptions to measure (or set limits on) the EFT
                      parameters. The interpretation of these results requires
                      instead a set of broad assumptions (e.g. power counting
                      rules) on the UV dynamics. This allows one to establish, in
                      a bottom-up approach, the validity range of the EFT
                      description, and to assess the error associated with the
                      truncation of the EFT series. We give a practical
                      prescription on how experimental results could be reported,
                      so that they admit a maximally broad range of theoretical
                      interpretations. Namely, the experimental constraints on
                      dimension-6 operators should be reported as functions of the
                      kinematic variables that set the relevant energy scale of
                      the studied process. This is especially important for hadron
                      collider experiments where collisions probe a wide range of
                      energy scales.},
      cin          = {T},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)T-20120731},
      pnm          = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF3-611) /
                      BSMAFTERLHC8 - Directions for BSM Physics after the First
                      Run of the LHC (628224) / HIGGSEFT - Higgs precision era at
                      the LHC (631962) / DAMESYFLA - Electroweak Symmetry
                      Breaking, Flavor and DarkMatter: One Solution for Three
                      Mysteries (267985)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-611 / G:(EU-Grant)628224 /
                      G:(EU-Grant)631962 / G:(EU-Grant)267985},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)29 / PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      eprint       = {1604.06444},
      howpublished = {arXiv:1604.06444},
      archivePrefix = {arXiv},
      SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:1604.06444;\%\%$},
      UT           = {WOS:000380691500001},
      doi          = {10.1007/JHEP07(2016)144},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/310789},
}