% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Bagnaschi:293097,
      author       = {Bagnaschi, Emanuele and Cacciari, Matteo and Guffanti,
                      Alberto and Jenniches, Laura},
      title        = {{A}n extensive survey of the estimation of uncertainties
                      from missing higher orders in perturbative calculations},
      journal      = {Journal of high energy physics},
      volume       = {2015},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {1029-8479},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2016-00262, arXiv:1409.5036},
      pages        = {133},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {We consider two approaches to estimate and characterise the
                      theoretical uncertainties stemming from the missing higher
                      orders in perturbative calculations in Quantum
                      Chromodynamics: the traditional one based on renormalisation
                      and factorisation scale variation, and the Bayesian
                      framework proposed by Cacciari and Houdeau. We estimate
                      uncertainties with these two methods for a comprehensive set
                      of more than thirty different observables computed in
                      perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, and we discuss their
                      performance in properly estimating the size of the higher
                      order terms that are known. We find that scale variation
                      with the conventional choice of varying scales within a
                      factor of two of a central scale gives uncertainty intervals
                      that tend to be somewhat too small to be interpretable as
                      $68\%$ confidence-level-heuristic ones. We propose a
                      modified version of the Bayesian approach of Cacciari and
                      Houdeau which performs well for non-hadronic observables
                      and, after an appropriate choice of the relevant expansion
                      parameter for the perturbative series, for hadronic ones
                      too.},
      cin          = {T},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)T-20120731},
      pnm          = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF3-611) / SFB 676
                      B08 - Globale SM + BSM Fits mit Resultaten vom LHC und
                      anderen Experimenten (B08) (87303299) / HIGGS@LHC - Search
                      and study of the Higgs bosons at the LHC (321133) /
                      LHCPHENONET - Advanced Particle Phenomenology in the LHC era
                      (264564)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-611 / G:(GEPRIS)87303299 /
                      G:(EU-Grant)321133 / G:(EU-Grant)264564},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)29 / PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      eprint       = {1409.5036},
      howpublished = {arXiv:1409.5036},
      archivePrefix = {arXiv},
      SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:1409.5036;\%\%$},
      UT           = {WOS:000350298100003},
      doi          = {10.1007/JHEP02(2015)133},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/293097},
}