% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Buchmuller:275712,
      author       = {Buchmuller, Wilfried and Dudas, Emilian and Heurtier,
                      Lucien and Westphal, Alexander and Wieck, Clemens and
                      Winkler, Martin Wolfgang},
      title        = {{C}hallenges for large-field inflation and moduli
                      stabilization},
      journal      = {Journal of high energy physics},
      volume       = {1504},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {1029-8479},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2015-04196, arXiv:1501.05812},
      pages        = {58},
      year         = {2015},
      note         = {OA},
      abstract     = {We analyze the interplay between Kähler moduli
                      stabilization and chaotic inflation in supergravity. While
                      heavy moduli decouple from inflation in the supersymmetric
                      limit, supersymmetry breaking generically introduces
                      non-decoupling effects. These lead to inflation driven by a
                      soft mass term, m φ 2  ∼ mm 3/2, where m is a
                      supersymmetric mass parameter. This scenario needs no
                      stabilizer field, but the stability of moduli during
                      inflation imposes a large supersymmetry breaking scale, m
                      3/2 ≫ H, and a careful choice of initial conditions. This
                      is illustrated in three prominent examples of moduli
                      stabilization: KKLT stabilization, Kähler Uplifting, and
                      the Large Volume Scenario. Remarkably, all models have a
                      universal effective inflaton potential which is flattened
                      compared to quadratic inflation. Hence, they share universal
                      predictions for the CMB observables, in particular a lower
                      bound on the tensor-to-scalar ratio, r ≳ 0.05.},
      cin          = {T},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)T-20120731},
      pnm          = {611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF3-611) /
                      VH-GS-500 - PIER Helmholtz Graduate School
                      $(2015_IFV-VH-GS-500)$ / MASSTEV - Mass hierarchy and
                      particle physics at the TeV scale (226371)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-611 / $G:(DE-HGF)2015_IFV-VH-GS-500$ /
                      G:(EU-Grant)226371},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)29 / PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      eprint       = {1501.05812},
      howpublished = {arXiv:1501.05812},
      archivePrefix = {arXiv},
      SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:1501.05812;\%\%$},
      UT           = {WOS:000356853600001},
      doi          = {10.1007/JHEP04(2015)058},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/275712},
}