% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Guenter:220093,
      author       = {Guenter, Clemens},
      title        = {{C}omparison of {I}ron and {T}ungsten {A}bsorber
                      {S}tructures for an {A}nalog {H}adron {C}alorimeter},
      issn         = {1435-8085},
      school       = {Universität Hamburg},
      type         = {Dr.},
      address      = {Hamburg},
      publisher    = {Verlag Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron},
      reportid     = {PUBDB-2015-02100, DESY-THESIS-2015-018},
      series       = {DESY-THESIS},
      pages        = {169},
      year         = {2015},
      note         = {Universität Hamburg, Diss., 2015},
      abstract     = {Future electron-positron-collider experiments will require
                      unprecedented jet-energy resolution to complete their
                      physics programs. This can only be achieved with novel
                      approaches to calorimetry. One of these novel approaches is
                      the Particle Flow Algorithm, which uses the best suited
                      sub-detector to measure the energy of the particles produced
                      by the electron-positron collision. The CALICE Collaboration
                      evaluates different read-out technologies for Particle Flow
                      Calorimeters. This thesis describes the comparison of two
                      different absorber materials, iron and tungsten, for the
                      CALICE Analog Hadron Calorimeter. It is described how
                      testbeam data, that has been recorded in the range from 2
                      GeV to 10 GeV with the Analog Hadron Calorimeter is
                      calibrated, and how samples are selected containing showers
                      from just one particle type. The data is then compared to
                      simulations and the remaining disagreement between data and
                      simulation is discussed. The validated simulations are then
                      used to decompose the showers into different fractions.
                      These fractions are compared for the two absorber materials
                      to understand the impact of the absorber material choice on
                      the calorimeter performance.},
      keywords     = {Dissertation (GND)},
      cin          = {FLC},
      cid          = {I:(DE-H253)FLC-20120731},
      pnm          = {632 - Detector technology and systems (POF3-632)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-632},
      experiment   = {EXP:(DE-H253)ILC(machine)-20150101},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)29 / PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.3204/DESY-THESIS-2015-018},
      url          = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/220093},
}