guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Challenges for Large-Field Inflation and Moduli Stabilization > print |
| Home > Publications database > Challenges for Large-Field Inflation and Moduli Stabilization > print |
| 001 | 207168 | ||
| 005 | 20211110130319.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a arXiv:1501.05812 |2 arXiv |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:3103017 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a inspire:1340834 |2 inspire |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a PUBDB-2015-01152 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 088 | 1 | _ | |a DESY-15-014; CPHT-RR002.0115; arXiv:1501.0581 |
| 088 | _ | _ | |a DESY-15-014 |2 DESY |
| 088 | _ | _ | |a CPHT-RR002.0115 |2 Other |
| 088 | _ | _ | |a arXiv:1501.0581 |2 arXiv |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Buchmuller, Wilfried |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1003059 |b 0 |u desy |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Challenges for Large-Field Inflation and Moduli Stabilization |
| 260 | _ | _ | |c 2015 |
| 300 | _ | _ | |a 44 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a report |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a REPORT |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Report |0 10 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Report |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Report |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)29 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |m report |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a TECHREPORT |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Internal Report |b intrep |m intrep |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)15 |s 1480951473_17742 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 490 | 0 | _ | |a Red Report |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a OA |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a We analyze the interplay between K\'ahler moduli stabilization and chaotic inflation in supergravity. While heavy moduli decouple from inflation in the supersymmetric limit, supersymmetry breaking generically introduces non-decoupling effects. These lead to inflation driven by a soft mass term, $m_\varphi^2 \sim m m_{3/2}$, where $m$ is a supersymmetric mass parameter. This scenario needs no stabilizer field, but the stability of moduli during inflation imposes a large supersymmetry breaking scale, $m_{3/2} \gg H$, and a careful choice of initial conditions. This is illustrated in three prominent examples of moduli stabilization: KKLT stabilization, K\'ahler Uplifting, and the Large Volume Scenario. Remarkably, all models have a universal effective inflaton potential which is flattened compared to quadratic inflation. Hence, they share universal predictions for the CMB observables, in particular a lower bound on the tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r \gtrsim 0.05$. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-611 |c POF3-611 |f POF III |x 0 |a 611 - Fundamental Particles and Forces (POF3-611) |
| 536 | _ | _ | |0 G:(DE-HGF)2015_IFV-VH-GS-500 |x 1 |c 2015_IFV-VH-GS-500 |a VH-GS-500 - PIER Helmholtz Graduate School (2015_IFV-VH-GS-500) |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a MASSTEV - Mass hierarchy and particle physics at the TeV scale (226371) |0 G:(EU-Grant)226371 |c 226371 |f ERC-2008-AdG |x 2 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to arXivarXiv |
| 693 | _ | _ | |0 EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101 |5 EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101 |e No specific instrument |x 0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Dudas, Emilian |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1022049 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Heurtier, Lucien |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Westphal, Alexander |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1013212 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Wieck, Clemens |0 P:(DE-H253)PIP1018677 |b 4 |e Corresponding Author |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Winkler, Martin Wolfgang |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |y 2015 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.05812 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/207168/files/1501.05812v1.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/207168/files/1501.05812v1.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |x icon-1440 |y OpenAccess |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/207168/files/1501.05812v1.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |x icon-180 |y OpenAccess |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/207168/files/1501.05812v1.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |x icon-640 |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:bib-pubdb1.desy.de:207168 |p openaire |p open_access |p driver |p VDB |p ec_fundedresources |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron |0 I:(DE-588b)2008985-5 |k DESY |b 0 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1003059 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron |0 I:(DE-588b)2008985-5 |k DESY |b 1 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1022049 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron |0 I:(DE-588b)2008985-5 |k DESY |b 3 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1013212 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron |0 I:(DE-588b)2008985-5 |k DESY |b 4 |6 P:(DE-H253)PIP1018677 |
| 913 | 0 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Struktur der Materie |l Elementarteilchenphysik |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-510 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-514 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-500 |v Theoretical Particle Physics |x 0 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Materie |l Materie und Universum |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-610 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-611 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-600 |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Fundamental Particles and Forces |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2015 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-H253)T-20120731 |k T |l Theorie-Gruppe |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a intrep |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a report |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-H253)T-20120731 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|