% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Aleksi:166280,
author = {Aleksić, J. and Ansoldi, S. and Antonelli, L. A. and
Antoranz, P. and Babic, A. and de Almeida, U. B. and Barrio,
J. A. and Gonzalez, J. B. and Bednarek, W. and Berger, K.
and Bernardini, E. and Biland, A. and Blanch, O. and Bock,
R. K. and Boller, A. and Bonnefoy, S. and Bonnoli, G. and
Borracci, F. and Bretz, T. and Carmona, E. and Carosi, A.
and Fidalgo, D. C. and Colin, P. and Colombo, E. and
Contreras, J. L. and Cortina, J. and Cossio, L. and Covino,
S. and Da Vela, P. and Dazzi, F. and De Angelis, A. and De
Caneva, G. and De Lotto, B. and Mendez, C. D. and Doert, M.
and Dominguez, A. and Prester, D. D. and Dorner, D. and
Doro, M. and Eisenacher, D. and Elsaesser, D. and Farina, E.
and Ferenc, D. and Fonseca, M. V. and Font, L. and Frantzen,
K. and Fruck, C. and Lopez, R. J. G. and Garczarczyk, M. and
Terrats, D. G. and Gaug, M. and Giavitto, G. and Godinovic,
N. and Munoz, A. G. and Gozzini, S. R. and Hadamek, A. and
Hadasch, D. and Herrero, A. and Hose, J. and Hrupec, D. and
Idec, W. and Kadenius, V. and Knoetig, M. L. and Krahenbuhl,
T. and Krause, J. and Kushida, J. and Barbera, A. L. and
Lelas, D. and Lewandowska, N. and Lindfors, E. and Lombardi,
S. and Lopez-Coto, R. and Lopez, M. and Lopez-Oramas, A. and
Lorenz, E. and Lozano, I. and Makariev, M. and Mallot, K.
and Maneva, G. and Mankuzhiyil, N. and Mannheim, K. and
Maraschi, L. and Marcote, B. and Mariotti, M. and Martinez,
M. and Masbou, J. and Mazin, D. and Menzel, U. and Meucci,
M. and Miranda, J. M. and Mirzoyan, R. and Moldon, J. and
Moralejo, A. and Munar-Adrover, P. and Nakajima, D. and
Niedzwiecki, A. and Nilsson, K. and Nowak, N. and Orito, R.
and Overkemping, A. and Paiano, S. and Palatiello, M. and
Paneque, D. and Paoletti, R. and Paredes, J. M. and Partini,
S. and Persic, M. and Prada, F. and Moroni, P. G. P. and
Prandini, E. and Preziuso, S. and Puljak, I. and Reichardt,
I. and Reinthal, R. and Rhode, W. and Ribo, M. and Rico, J.
and Garcia, J. R. and Rugamer, S. and Saggion, A. and Saito,
K. and Saito, T. and Salvati, M. and Satalecka, K. and
Scalzotto, V. and Scapin, V. and Schultz, C. and Schweizer,
T. and Shore, S. N. and Sillanpaa, A. and Sitarek, J. and
Snidaric, I. and Sobczynska, D. and Spanier, F. and
Stamatescu, V. and Stamerra, A. and Storz, J. and Sun, S.
and Suric, T. and Takalo, L. and Tavecchio, F. and Temnikov,
P. and Terzic, T. and Tescaro, D. and Teshima, M. and
Thaele, J. and Tibolla, O. and Torres, D. F. and Toyama, T.
and Treves, A. and Uellenbeck, M. and Vogler, P. and Wagner,
R. M. and Weitzel, Q. and Zandanel, F. and Zanin, R. and
Bouvier, A. and Hayashida, M. and Tajima, H. and Longo, F.},
title = {{MAGIC} upper limits on the {GRB} 090102 afterglow},
journal = {Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
volume = {437},
number = {4},
issn = {1365-2966},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {DESY-2014-01207, arXiv:1311.3637},
pages = {3103 - 3111},
year = {2014},
note = {8 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to MNRAS},
abstract = {Indications of a GeV component in the emission from GRBs
are known since the EGRET observations during the 1990's and
they have been confirmed by the data of the Fermi satellite.
These results have, however, shown that our understanding of
GRB physics is still unsatisfactory. The new generation of
Cherenkov observatories and in particular the MAGIC
telescope, allow for the first time the possibility to
extend the measurement of GRBs from several tens up to
hundreds of GeV energy range. Both leptonic and hadronic
processes have been suggested to explain the possible
GeV/TeV counterpart of GRBs. Observations with ground-based
telescopes of very high energy photons (E>30 GeV) from these
sources are going to play a key role in discriminating among
the different proposed emission mechanisms, which are barely
distinguishable at lower energies. MAGIC telescope
observations of the GRB 090102 (z=1.547) field and Fermi
Large Area Telescope (LAT) data in the same time interval
are analysed to derive upper limits of the GeV/TeV emission.
We compare these results to the expected emissions evaluated
for different processes in the framework of a relativistic
blast wave model for the afterglow. Simultaneous upper
limits with Fermi and a Cherenkov telescope have been
derived for this GRB observation. The results we obtained
are compatible with the expected emission although the
difficulties in predicting the HE and VHE emission for the
afterglow of this event makes it difficult to draw firmer
conclusions. Nonetheless, MAGIC sensitivity in the energy
range of overlap with space-based instruments (above about
40 GeV) is about one order of magnitude better with respect
to Fermi. This makes evident the constraining power of
ground-based observations and shows that the MAGIC telescope
has reached the required performance to make possible GRB
multiwavelength studies in the very high energy range.},
cin = {ZEU-EXP/AT},
ddc = {520},
cid = {$I:(DE-H253)ZEU-EXP_AT-20120731$},
pnm = {523 - High-energy gamma ray astronomy (POF2-523)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-523},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000329177100007},
eprint = {1311.3637},
howpublished = {arXiv:1311.3637},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
SLACcitation = {$\%\%CITATION$ = $arXiv:1311.3637;\%\%$},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2041},
url = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/166280},
}