% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kutterolf:151781,
author = {Kutterolf, S. and Hansteen, T. H. and Appel, K. and
Freundt, A. and Kruger, K. and Perez, W. and Wehrmann, H.
and DESY},
title = {{C}ombined bromine and chlorine release from large
explosive volcanic eruptions: {A} threat to stratospheric
ozone?},
journal = {Geology},
volume = {41},
issn = {0091-7613},
address = {Melville, NY},
publisher = {American Institute of Physics},
reportid = {PHPPUBDB-26522},
pages = {707},
year = {2013},
note = {© Geological Society of America},
abstract = {Endoscopic bilateral drainage for inoperable malignant
hilar biliary strictures (HBS) using metal stents is
considered to be technically difficult. Furthermore,
endoscopic revision of bilateral stenting after occlusion
can be challenging. This study was performed to evaluate the
long-term efficacy of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent
placement of cross-wired metallic stents in high-grade
malignant HBS and planned endoscopic bilateral revision.A
total of 84 patients with inoperable high-grade malignant
HBS were enrolled from three academic tertiary referral
centers. Two cross-wired metal stents were inserted using a
bilateral stent-in-stent placement method. Bilateral
endoscopic revision was also performed during follow-up
using either identical metal stents or plastic stents. The
main outcome measurements were technical and functional
success, complications, stent patency, and endoscopic
revision efficacy.The technical and clinical success rates
of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement of
cross-wired metallic stents were $95.2\%$ (80/84) and
$92.9\%$ (78/84), respectively. Median patency (range) and
survival were 238 days (10-429) and 256 days (10-1130),
respectively. Obstruction of primary bilateral stents
occurred in $30.8\%$ (24/78) of patients with functionally
successful stent placement. The technical and clinical
success rates of planned bilateral endoscopic revision for
occluded stents were $83.3\%$ (20/24) and $79.2\%$ (19/24),
respectively. For revision, bilateral metallic stents were
placed in 11 patients $(55.0\%);$ the remaining patients
received plastic stents.Palliative endoscopic bilateral
stent-in-stent placement of cross-wired metallic stents was
effective in patients with inoperable HBS. Revision
endoscopic bilateral stenting may be feasible and successful
in cases where the primary deployed metal stents are
occluded.},
cin = {DOOR / FS-DO},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-H253)HAS-User-20120731 / I:(DE-H253)FS-DO-20120731},
pnm = {DORIS Beamline L (POF1-550)},
pid = {G:(DE-H253)POF1-L-20130405},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-H253)D-L-20150101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:23212727},
UT = {WOS:000323269800021},
doi = {10.1130/G34044.1},
url = {https://bib-pubdb1.desy.de/record/151781},
}